Jump to content

The Death Penalty and Schwarzenegger


tflon

Recommended Posts

On January 19th of this year Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger allowed the

first death sentence to be served in three years, and the first under

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. That is almost copied straight from a

news site (because honestly if I hadn’t, there’s no way I’d have been

able to spell Arnie’s name!)

Anyway, I recently caught an ad for a movie on Court TV called The

Exonerated. It’s based on true stories of several people who spent

years on death row for crimes they didn’t commit. The original version

was a play which inspired my interest in the subject of the death

penalty. I specifically remember one guy who spent something like 20

years on death row before finally being cleared.

Now before someone jumps all over me: I’m not saying that the guy who

was just executed in California was innocent. But does anyone think

it’s acceptable that even one innocent person could be executed? I

think it’s about time this country joins the rest of the civilized

world and adopts a more humane approach. For those of you still on the

fence on this issue, I’d check out this movie, because if it’s anything

like the play the personal stories will astound you. I think it airs on

January 27 (but check courttv.com just in case I’m wrong). And if you

have thoughts on this issue, I’d like to hear them.

Sylvio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll try to catch that.

Like Dude, I'm against the idea on principle. The system just isn't perfect.

sidebar - The David Milgard inquiry started this week. Milgard was sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape and murder of a nursing student here in Saskatoon. After 23 years of prison, with his mom fighting for his freedom all the way, he was exhonerated by DNA evidence in the 90's.

Milgard was cleared within a fairly short period of Donald Marshall. Marshall was cleared by DNA after serving more than 11 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what Dude said above. and yeah, welcome to BK, tflon. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm against it. Nobody can decide if a human dies or not. Yes, you can say that they are killers but they might not be.

I'm NOT against killing warlords. By warlords I mean presidents/prime ministers that send kids to death for no reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm NOT against killing warlords. By warlords I mean presidents/prime ministers that send kids to death for no reason

*sigh* especially when the preznit/his admin never served themselves and then lie about it (and especially when it's really for the goddamn oil). :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't only mean Bush. I also mean the Russian leader(s) for Chechnya, Israel and Palestinian leaders, the French, the...the...the. Some wars have a "good" reason but most of them are useless and kids get killed for nothing.

I blame the kids in some situations for volunteering but most of the times the goverment makes them go even if they don't want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe in the death penalty not on the premise of revenge, but on the premise of orderly disposal and as a deterrent.

If a human being is so vile that he or she is nothing more than a rabid animal, they shouldn't exist. They're too dangerous and the only other option (forever imprisoned) would still put a strain on society.

Nobody can decide if a human dies or not.

Sometimes one human must decide another's fate. It happens. In this instance it's to make sure dangerous humans don't go on a spree of unspeakable destruction and then take up space, air, and money in a jail cell that would be well suited for someone else instead; maybe even for someone who could be rehabilitated (at least somewhat).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...