Ken

Words of wisdom. :strumma:

Wasn't this a Monty Python thing?

I'm still looking for elvis. I can see the peanut butter sandwich, but it looks like he's flown the coop. One for the money, two for the show, three to get ready, and......I just hope he didn't go in his pants.

That's an awesome background wolfie. :frog:

Poor poor sheep. I feel sorry for them. 4 hours of torture. :taskmaster:

:horny:

If it was legalized, there wouldn't be stupid fucking idiots, in Arizona, driving around with 4,112 pounds of it, in a garbage truck.

It's called "Everybody Hurts". I must say, I kind of like "In Time: The Best Of R.E.M 1988-2003". The only gripe I have, is there is no "It's the end of the world, as we know it (and I feel fine)", and "The one I love" only appears on the special bonus CD import as a live track (so it's basically not part of this particular release). I'm going to be honest, i'm not going to buy it. It's a "best of" album, that's lacking 2 of their best songs (but it's still good), and "best of" albums are money grab attempts. REM isn't dead, so where is the new music guys? They've been releasing, but everything new, doesn't have the appeal. No sale.

I'm happy to report, that i've haven't been a victim of any of these new, head-ache causing worms that are appearing, almost daily it seems. Keep defs up to date, monitor your comps processes, don't open e-mails you're unsure of, even if you know the person sending it (they could be infected, and are attempting to spread). A little basic knowledge of e-mail, your OS, and common sense, will spare you......... Firewall never hurt anyone either (or if you have a router, that's good).

He's no Jim Morrison. I've seen pictures of this guy, he dresses the part too (though, that has nothing to do with it). He can't sing anyway, so he might as well spit.......... :sick:

Just say the owls were your pets. Vet bill!!!!!!!!!!

Litigation will get them nowhere. Mr. Genie is out of his bottle, and nobody, even with a big bankroll, will be able to put him back in.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA. That's just funny, by itself. Really, that's an SNL (MAD TV) skit in the making, and they have the perfect person to play Michael Jackson..............Michael Jackson!

R.E.M - "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?"

I loved Goldeneye for the N64. One of my favorite games of all time. :duck hunt: :shootin:

Well, I like acoustic versions of songs. I downloaded it. I'm not readily familiar with Godsmack. I've heard "I stand alone" (or something along those lines). When listening, they sound a lot like Metallica, except.... 1.) The are playing their instruments upside down 2.) The songs seems out of synch 3.) Out of tune? 4.) The lead singer sounds like a subdued James Hetfield, on morphine. 5.) It made my cat sick, and they will be getting the vet bill.

Wow. Pretty soon, they'll have a conservative army, and it'll be just like the South Park movie.

:frog: This....this.... You people bring tears to my eyes. May the eternal bouncing frog, bless BeatKing with prosperity. Amen. :frog:

It may be, but if he's honestly expressing how he felt, the condition he was/is in, then what can we say? I don't think anyone, from any side of the marijuana debate, will ever tell the whole, non-bias truth about it's effects. I wouldn't know though.

Grammys? What are those? Oh, yeah, that's right. An RIAA bullshit event.

Or you could wait until night-fall, and look up I can honestly say that I would walk by any "celebrity" and not even care. Even one I may like.

Umma I'm sure it can be "obtained", without "financial loss".

:frog: I believe this bouncing frog says it all.

Domain name system overseer accused of overstepping its authority Story by Grant Gross FEBRUARY 26, 2004 ( IDG NEWS SERVICE ) - WASHINGTON - VeriSign Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) today, accusing the organization of overstepping its contractual authority and improperly attempting to regulate VeriSign's business. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, seeks an undetermined amount of damages from ICANN, the nonprofit corporation responsible for allocating Internet Protocol address space and managing top-level domains. VeriSign is also asking the court for an injunction to force ICANN to adhere to its contract with VeriSign. VeriSign alleges that ICANN, by straying from its charter and agreement to be a technical coordination body, has improperly attempted to become the "de facto regulator of the domain name system and in doing so stifled the introduction of new services that benefit Internet users and promote the growth of the Internet," according to a VeriSign announcement. VeriSign accuses ICANN of overstepping its authority in contracts with VeriSign and the U.S. Department of Commerce to delay VeriSign from offering new Internet services not related to ICANN's mission. VeriSign accuses ICANN of dragging its feet on allowing VeriSign to provide features such as a wait list service, essentially a waiting list for expired domain names, and internationalized domain names, which are domain names in non-English characters, said a VeriSign spokesman. VeriSign also disagrees with ICANN objections forcing the company to take down its Site Finder Internet search service, said Tom Galvin, vice president of government relations for VeriSign. "At the heart of the lawsuit is a contract dispute between two corporations," Galvin said. "ICANN's ambition has exceeded its authority." An ICANN spokesman said the organization had just heard of the lawsuit. He didn't have an immediate comment. VeriSign doesn't want to end the role of ICANN, just define a clear and credible mission for the organization, Galvin said. "There's a lot of ambiguity for ICANN about what their role is, and complete ambiguity about offering new services," he added. "Working the ICANN process is like being nibbled to death by a duck. It makes no sense, and in the end, you're dead in the water." The VeriSign lawsuit seeks to define the process for introducing new Internet-related services, Galvin said. Companies like VeriSign need clarity on the process so that they can decide whether to invest more money in the Internet, he added. "While this is a simple contact dispute, there's a lot at stake here about innovation," he said. Source

Wow. That's not even worth downloading, let alone buying. I bet they slapped a $13.99 USD price tag on that.