Jump to content

Charging charities VAT


Stuzb

Recommended Posts

From The Times 17 April 2004

'THE taxman is trying to claw back £10 million a year from charities that employ street fundraisers, The Times has learnt.'

'Although one high street fundraiser can cost as much as £100 a day, charities say they are good value for money. Now customs officers say that charities must pay VAT on monies paid to chuggers. This could cost major charities at least £1 million each.

The better news:

'Charities are planning to take their grievances to a VAT tribunal at the end of the month, with the Children’s Society leading the test case.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,175-1077413,00.html' target='_blank'>

Basically, the plan is to charge VAT (currently 17.5% in Britain) on any money one of these street fundraisers collects from members of the general public, all because the Inland Revenue are trying to claim it's a form of a sale - and it's the same reason they currently charge VAT on income raised from those who fundraise by running the London Marathon.

Can our [british] government be that desperately in need of income sources that they need the comparitively miniscule amount of money that this badly thought out plan will raise?

If they do, can I suggest that the Queen be paid less, or maybe the MP's could start paying their way, instead of eating at subsidised restaurants, drinking in subsidised bars, and avoiding paying tax themselves because they have exempted themselves from certain income-tax schemes. Maybe they could then leave the charities alone, particularly as some charities are only in existence because of the inadequacies of the Government to address certain social problems.

I don't know what the situation is in the US, or elsewhere in the World, but in Britain it fucking stinks, and now charities are being expected to cover the bar-bill of the allegedly socialist Government.

Heads on pointy sticks is quite an appealing idea at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Little surcharges like this drive me crazy. The Universities have a similar scheme. If you donate say a million bucks, the university takes an admistrative fee; so instead of giving a million for shcolarships to needy student,s it actually works out to like 750gs. Stuzb, you are right to point out that this disgusting, and is depriving those of really in need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...