Dismal Six Weeks for Bush Has Supporters Edgy

[Kooperman]

Dismal Six Weeks for Bush Has Supporters Edgy

Feb 19, 12:45 PM (ET)

By Alan Elsner

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Since the beginning of 2004, President Bush has suffered one political misfire after another, prompting some Republicans to wonder anxiously when the White House political machine will get in gear.

"This may have been the worst six weeks of Bush's political career," said Rick Davis, who managed the 2000 presidential bid by Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain which lost to Bush.

In the latest embarrassment to hit the White House, the administration on Wednesday distanced itself from its own buoyant employment forecast that had predicted 2.6 million new jobs this year.

That followed red faces over a statement by Gregory Mankiw, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, who described the process by which hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs are migrating overseas as both natural and good.

With many Americans extremely anxious over their job security, that statement seemed particularly callous and politically ill-judged.

"For whatever reason, the White House has hit a rough patch and can't seem to get its political machinery in motion," said Keith Appell, a Republican political consultant.

"They seemed to be caught by surprise by the force of the negative rhetoric that emerged from the Democratic presidential campaign and now they need to start scrambling to get their own message out," he said.

Republicans say the U.S. media have focused on the contest among Democrats to find an opponent for Bush in the November election and have been dominated by the candidates' fierce criticism of Bush over Iraq, the economy and other issues.

A CNN/Gallup/USA Today poll issued on Thursday showed the two top Democratic contenders with big leads over Bush. Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the front-runner, led Bush 55 to 43 percent among likely voters and North Carolina Sen. John Edwards was ahead 54 percent to 44 percent.

Appell and other strategists say early year jitters may mean little for the election outcome. Many believe Bush, with a big advantage in campaign funds -- he has raised almost $150 million -- still has the upper hand going into the battle.

Still, for a White House renowned for its political skills, the past six weeks have been sobering. The list of misfires is lengthy.

STRING OF PROBLEMS

Bush's State of the Union Address was not well received and neither was his budget. Major policy initiatives on sending humans to Mars and reforming immigration law had a mixed reception at best. An interview with NBC's Tim Russert, a rare such appearance for Bush, failed to quieten the criticism.

The White House allowed a controversy over Bush's service in the National Guard to grab headlines for two weeks. And the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Bush's main justification for last year's war, promises to be a continuing embarrassment.

"It seems to me that Bush's people were so busy raising their incredible war chest that they didn't focus on reaching back to their political base and to the people," said K.B. Forbes, a former spokesman for Republican presidential candidates Steve Forbes and Pat Buchanan.

Bay Buchanan, who ran her brother Pat Buchanan's maverick 1996 and 2000 presidential bids, said: "They do not have their campaign legs yet. There has been a bit of fumbling. It's not critical but it cannot go on or it will become critical. Bush is not in game form and he needs to get into form quickly."

Some commentators believe the White House became complacent late last year when they assumed Bush would be facing former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, whom they regarded as an ultra-liberal out of step with the country, in the election.

Now, with Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry the probable opponent Republicans have to throw out their early expectations of an easy victory and prepare for a tough fight against a respected Vietnam War veteran with a solid U.S. Senate record.

Bush's biggest immediate decision is when to publicly embrace a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage and whether he should also come out against allowing same-sex couples to have civil unions that give them many of the same rights as married people.

Republican sources said Bush's political adviser Karl Rove has assured leading conservatives the president will soon give his backing to a constitutional amendment.

"This is absolutely the number one issue for conservatives and the sooner Bush gets out there the more he will energize his support," said Appell.

http://news.myway.com/top/article/id/38624...48|reuters.html

[DudeAsInCool]

Just like in California, I sense voters want a change. It doesnt really matter what political side you are on--they want new faces

[rainbowdemon]

The opinion I keep seeing is that Bush is a moron. But the capture of Saddam had to win him a lot of points.

[Kooperman]

I always vote for the candidate, regardless of party affiliation, who I feel can do the best job in office. In the past I've voted for, in order, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan (twice), George Bush, Bill Clinton (twice) and Al Gore(in this case I viewed him as the lesser of two dunces). Just as in 1980, when Jimmy Carter was running on 4 years of poor leadership, and in 1992, when George Bush was coming off 4 years of mistakes, I feel that there needs to be a major change in the direction of this country. When a substantial portion of the President's own political party is unhappy with the economy and foreign policy, I think that's a very telling sign. It's time for another person to attempt to get the job done.