Jump to content

Google Discarded 21,000,000 Takedown Requests in 2013


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/google-bay.jpg[/img]Since last year copyright holders have started to increase the number of DMCA takedown requests they send to Google.

In 2011 Google was asked to remove less than 10 million links from its search engine, which quickly grew to more than 50 million last year. In 2013 the notices nearly quintupled again, and at the time of writing Google has been asked to remove more than 235 million URLs.

TorrentFreak decided to take a closer look at all [url="http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/"]these requests[/url], and we can report on some rather interesting findings concerning the volume and accuracy of the DMCA notices sent by various copyright holders.

The music industry has been most active by far, with the anti-piracy groups BPI and RIAA sending in removal requests for 41.7 and 30.8 million links respectively. Twentieth Century Fox, Froytal Services and Microsoft complete the top five with 19.3, 19.2 and 10.4 million allegedly infringing URLs.

Sheer volume aside, one of the most striking findings is that Google took “no action” for roughly 9% of all takedown requests this year, which equals 21 million URLs. This number includes both inaccurate takedown notices as well as duplicate URLs which have been already taken down.

The most takedown requests for which “no action” was taken come from the BPI. Google discarded over 520,000 links sent by the music group, which is 11% of the URLs they submitted this year.

Of all copyright holders who submitted more than 1 million URLs, Lynda.com takes the crown when it comes to the highest percentage of discarded takedown requests. Google took no action for 57% of the 1,178,809 URLs the company sent in.

NBC Universal and Warner are runners-up in the worst performer category, as Google discarded 28% and 25% of their notices respectively.





[b]Percentage of URLs for which Google took no action (+1 million only)[/b]
[url="http://torrentfreak.com/images/noaction.png"][img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/noaction.png[/img][/url]

Luckily, there are also copyright holders with a much better track record. The RIAA, Adobe and BREIN perform relatively well, for example, with Google discarding only 2% of their takedown notices.

Behind the scenes Google is keeping a close eye on the results for which they take “no action,” in particular the ones where copyright holders are abusing the system.

“We still do our best to catch errors or abuse so we don’t mistakenly disable access to non-infringing material. Google continues to put substantial resources into improving and streamlining this process, including into identifying erroneous and abusive takedowns, and deterring abuse,” Google told us previously.

Copyright holders, on the other hand, believe Google should also be more proactive when it comes to infringing sites. For example, the RIAA previously asked Google to start banning [url="http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-20-million-piracy-takedowns-sent-to-google-still-no-end-in-sight-130522/"]entire domains[/url] from its search results.

“Every day produces more results and there is no end in sight. We are using a bucket to deal with an ocean of illegal downloading,” Brad Buckles, RIAA executive vice president of anti-piracy complained earlier.

It will be interesting to see how the tension between Google and the copyright holders develops in 2014, and whether the volume of DMCA requests will quintuple once again.

Source: [url="http://torrentfreak.com"]TorrentFreak[/url], for the latest info on [url="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/"]copyright[/url], [url="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/"]file-sharing[/url] and [url="http://torrentfreak.com/vpn-services-that-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2013-edition-130302/"]VPN services[/url].

[url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=GXzIjrCV8rs:dWUXcPg6MDY:yIl2AUoC8zA"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?d=yIl2AUoC8zA[/img]</img>[/url] [url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=GXzIjrCV8rs:dWUXcPg6MDY:D7DqB2pKExk"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?i=GXzIjrCV8rs:dWUXcPg6MDY:D7DqB2pKExk[/img]</img>[/url][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~4/GXzIjrCV8rs[/img]

[url=http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/GXzIjrCV8rs/]View the full article[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...