Jump to content

Court Forbids IsoHunt From Indexing Dead Torrent Sites


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/isohunt-logo.jpg[/img]In 2010, a California District Court ordered isoHunt to implement a filter to exclude movie and TV show-related terms from its search engine.

Despite running the filter for some time the Canada-based torrent search engine hoped to have the decision overruled on appeal, but in March this year that aim suffered a setback.

The Ninth Circuit [url="http://torrentfreak.com/isohunt-loses-appeal-against-the-mpaa-keyword-filter-remains-130321/"]upheld[/url] the decision of the lower court. In addition, the court requested that the permanent injunction should be updated to clarify some parts that could be interpreted in multiple ways.

Last month the MPAA and isoHunt legal teams got together to propose a modified injunction, which the court has signed off on last week.

Overall the changes are fairly minimal, and isoHunt is still required to filter its site based on a list of infringing keywords provided by the MPAA. In addition, the BitTorrent site is prohibited from indexing torrents or linking to various other file-sharing sites.

Initially, the injunction held that isoHunt could not index or provide access to [i]“Dot-torrent or similar files harvested or collected from well-known infringing source sites, such as The Pirate Bay.”[/i]

Since the term “well-known infringing source sites” is open to interpretation, this part was updated by naming specific sites.

Under [url="http://www.scribd.com/doc/160196087/Mpaa-Isohunt-Modified"]the new injunction[/url] isoHunt is prohibited from [i]“indexing or providing access to Dot-torrent or similar files harvested or collected from the following sites or services: The Pirate Bay, Torrentspy, BT Junkie, Torrentreactor.net, kat.ph or torrents.net”[/i]


[b]No index[/b]
[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/mpaa-noindex.png[/img]

While it’s understandable that this language is updated, the inclusion of “TorrentSpy and BTJunkie” is peculiar since these sites closed down a long time ago.

TorrentSpy closed down half a decade ago when the MPAA won a [url="http://torrentfreak.com/torrentspy-one-year-after-the-shutdown-090324/"]$110 million judgment[/url] against the site. BTJunkie has been around for longer, but threw in the towel [url="http://torrentfreak.com/btjunkie-shuts-down-for-good-120206/"]early last[/url] year after the Megaupload raid.

Needless to say, there’s not much that can be harvested from these sites so isoHunt should have no issues complying with this part of the injunction.

The injunction does, however, allow the MPAA to request that new sites are added to this list when they have sufficient proof that they’re infringing. This effectively means that it can severely limit isoHunt’s sources.

Another update to the injunction is that isoHunt is prohibited from advertising its services by referring to the following sites: The Pirate Bay, TorrentSpy, Aimster, Kazaa, Grokster, Morpheus, Newzbin, BT Junkie, Torrentreactor.net, kat.ph, torrents.net, SurftheChannel.com, Kino.to, Movie2k.to, and/or Dl4all.com.

Again we see TorrentSpy and BTJunkie listed, as well as many other defunct services including Kazaa, Grokster and SurftheChannel.com.

Overall the modified injunction doesn’t change much for isoHunt. However, the MPAA is still pursuing hundreds of [url="http://torrentfreak.com/mpaa-wants-up-to-750-million-in-damages-from-isohunt-130729/"]millions of dollars[/url] in damages as well as a [url="http://torrentfreak.com/mpaa-demands-source-code-of-isohunts-failing-piracy-filter-130720/"]motion for contempt[/url], as the movie studios claim that isoHunt’s filtering software is not working.

And so the case continues.

Source: [url="http://torrentfreak.com/court-forbids-isohunt-from-indexing-dead-torrent-sites-130814/"]Court Forbids IsoHunt From Indexing Dead Torrent Sites[/url]

[url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=VSMJzfRGATo:gOPgJlJkk78:yIl2AUoC8zA"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?d=yIl2AUoC8zA[/img]</img>[/url] [url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=VSMJzfRGATo:gOPgJlJkk78:D7DqB2pKExk"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?i=VSMJzfRGATo:gOPgJlJkk78:D7DqB2pKExk[/img]</img>[/url][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~4/VSMJzfRGATo[/img]

[url=http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/VSMJzfRGATo/]View the full article[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...