Jump to content

Record Labels Order Playlist.com To Kill its Music Service


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

[url="http://torrentfreak.com/images/playlist.jpg"][img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/playlist.jpg[/img][/url]Playlist (previously known as Project Playlist) was born back in 2006 with the aim of bringing music to growing social networking platforms such as MySpace.

From humble beginnings the site grew its membership to more than 20 million in 2008 but problems lay ahead.

During the same year the company was [url="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9930419-7.html"]sued by the RIAA[/url] for “reproducing plaintiffs’ valuable works (and inducing and enabling others to do so) without any authorization whatsoever, without paying any compensation whatsoever.”

Project Playlist (PP) protested, claiming that they didn’t host any music and merely pointed users’ playlists to content hosted on third-party websites. PP came to an agreement with one label, Sony, but disputes with the other labels remained.

In another blow, later in 2008 both Facebook and MySpace removed Project Playlist’s widgets from their sites.

Following an agreement in 2009 which saw EMI’s music come to PP, in May 2010 the company [url="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20004738-261.html"]settled[/url] with Universal and Warner. At this time, Project Playlist had more than 42 million users.

However, things were going downhill. A messy [url="http://www.wired.com/business/2010/08/music-royalties-strangle-playlist-com/"]bankruptcy[/url] and dispute over royalties later that year continued to take their toll. Having been renamed to just ‘Playlist’ the site moved on but with traffic declining significantly since 2011, just a few days ago the service suffered its biggest setback yet.





[b]How things used to be[/b]
[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/playlistlarge.jpg[/img]

“We’re launching the new Playlist smart radio service today!” the company announced July 1.

“We know you put a lot of effort into creating 80 million playlists at Playlist.com. So we’ve built radio stations out of all 80 million…whoa, that’s a lot of stations.”

Even though the changes were advertised as something positive, the scale back of service prompted a backlash.

“The new Playlist is TERRIBLE!!” screamed one user on Facebook. “I liked [the original] because I could listen to what I wanted when I wanted. I could search a song and it would be right there. Now, it has a dumb radio. YouTube is better than this now!”

On July 6 the site’s operators reported they were “psyched” by feedback on the changes, but comments from the site’s users suggested all was not well.

“So all these complaints, and you still think this is a good idea,” one complained. “Wow, I’m at loss for words for how idiotic your website is. I really doubt you can compete with Pandora or Spotify. When will you learn that we want to listen to our music, not music that closely matches it?”

Now a much clearer picture is emerging. Playlist.com has just revealed that the changes were forced upon them due to problems with the labels.

“The bottom line is the licensing gods were not smiling on us (aka we would have been sued) and we had to make a change,” the company admits.

“We didn’t want to air our dirty laundry but…the record labels required us to shut down the original Playlist service. We’re so sorry; it was our life for over 6 years.”

Playlist.com says that user playlist information is safe and will now be used to play recommendations within a “smart radio” format, noting that the company is now being “forced to play by Internet radio rules.”

TorrentFreak reached out to Playlist and the RIAA for comment and will update this article when we receive a response.

Source: [url="http://torrentfreak.com/record-labels-order-playlist-com-to-kill-its-music-service-130711/"]Record Labels Order Playlist.com To Kill its Music Service[/url]

[url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=2yGZJJatwgo:CGIHgtWo8GU:yIl2AUoC8zA"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?d=yIl2AUoC8zA[/img]</img>[/url] [url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=2yGZJJatwgo:CGIHgtWo8GU:D7DqB2pKExk"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?i=2yGZJJatwgo:CGIHgtWo8GU:D7DqB2pKExk[/img]</img>[/url][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~4/2yGZJJatwgo[/img]

[url=http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/2yGZJJatwgo/]View the full article[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...