Jump to content

The Copyright Monopoly Was Always Intended To Prevent Freedom Of Expression


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/copyright-branded.jpg[/img]When Queen Mary I created the copyright monopoly on [url="http://falkvinge.net/2011/02/02/history-of-copyright-part-2-tudoric-feud/"]May 4, 1557[/url], it was a purebred censorship mechanism: in exchange for a lucrative monopoly on printing, the London Company of Stationers agreed to let anything printed first pass by the royal censors.

This was the norm for a long time in England, and the monopoly has been used to prevent freedom of speech since, with the exception of 1695-1710, as the monopoly did not exist during those fifteen years.

The examples are plenty of how the copyright monopoly has been used as a bludgeon against freedoms of speech and expression. From the landmark court case in 1765, when the [url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entick_v_Carrington"]Entick vs. Carrington[/url] case determined that authorities had no right to quell free speech unless the method used is specifically enabled by law, right up until modern times when the Finnish oil company Neste Oil disgracefully used the copyright monopoly to [url="http://falkvinge.net/2012/06/20/oil-company-sues-isp-kills-greenpeace-protest-site/"]kill[/url] a legitimate Greenpeace protest site against the oil company (by threatening to sue the Internet Service Provider, to boot, and not Greenpeace directly).

The fact that the copyright monopoly is a limitation on freedom of expression, and therefore an interference with fundamental human rights, has even been [url="http://falkvinge.net/2013/02/07/court-of-human-rights-convictions-for-file-sharing-violates-human-rights/"]confirmed recently[/url] by the European Court of Human Rights.

And yet, when you outline this very clear picture, some dinosaurs will insist that the freedom of expression only covers “your own” expressions, and not “other people’s” expressions, in an attempt to defend the legitimacy of the copyright monopoly. This is hogwash of the lowest conceivable quality. There is no such thing as “other people’s expressions” that aren’t covered by freedom of expression when I repeat them in a message of my own.

[b]When I sing “Happy Birthday” to somebody, that is quite obviously a message of my own aimed at somebody having a birthday, despite my singing that song being an illegal violation of the copyright monopoly. It is therefore trivial to see how the copyright monopoly is an illegitimate limitation on freedom of expression.[/b]

Oh by the way, the Q&A session in Dublin ended well: after the elderly enraged gentleman had tried to “correct” my highlight of the need for copyright monopoly reform by reciting the entire arsenal of commonly-debunked arguments of the copyright industry, a younger professional took the microphone and calmly explained how pretty much every view I had expressed was perfectly in tune with his generation’s values. Everybody in the room took careful note.


[b][img]http://falkvinge.net/wp-content/themes/WpNewspaper/images/falkvinge/Rick_Falkvinge_39x130.jpg[/img][color=#3F3F3F][size=2]About The[/size][/color] [color=#FF3C78][size=2]Author[/size][/color]

[/b]
[font=PTSansRegular,Arial,Sans-Serif]Rick Falkvinge is a regular columnist on TorrentFreak, sharing his thoughts every other week. He is the founder of the Swedish and first Pirate Party, a whisky aficionado, and a low-altitude motorcycle pilot. His blog at [url="http://falkvinge.net"]falkvinge.net[/url] focuses on information policy.[/font]

Book Falkvinge [url="http://falkvinge.net/keynotes/"]as speaker[/url]?

[url="http://twitter.com/Falkvinge"]Follow @Falkvinge[/url]

Source: [url="http://torrentfreak.com/the-copyright-monopoly-was-always-intended-to-prevent-freedom-of-expression-130414/"]The Copyright Monopoly Was Always Intended To Prevent Freedom Of Expression[/url]

[url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=eIBTOHBSYjo:pH4yQxFAYq0:yIl2AUoC8zA"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?d=yIl2AUoC8zA[/img]</img>[/url] [url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=eIBTOHBSYjo:pH4yQxFAYq0:D7DqB2pKExk"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?i=eIBTOHBSYjo:pH4yQxFAYq0:D7DqB2pKExk[/img]</img>[/url][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~4/eIBTOHBSYjo[/img]

[url=http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/eIBTOHBSYjo/]View the full article[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...