Jump to content

Movie Studios Want Google to Take Down Their Own Takedown Request


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/google-bay.jpg[/img]There’s a dark side to Google’s transparency efforts, especially when it comes to [url="http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/faq/#chilling_effects"]publishing DMCA requests[/url] it receives from copyright holders.

With more than 100 million links to pirated files Google is steadily building the largest database of copyrighted material. This is rather ironic as it would only take one skilled coder to index the URLs from the DMCA notices in order [url="https://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=site:chillingeffects.org+game+of+thrones"]to create[/url] one of the largest pirate search engines available.

Indeed, the DMCA notices are meant to make content harder to find on the Internet, but in the process they create a semi-organized index of links to infringing material.

This problem is illustrated by several takedown requests that were sent on behalf of movie studio 20th Century Fox recently. Usually these notices ask Google to remove links to pirate sites, but Fox also wants Google to remove the DMCA notices they sent earlier.

Below is an example, with [url="http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/requests/488704/"]Fox stating[/url] that [url="http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=753950"]this DMCA takedown request[/url] is “infringing” itself.





[b]Meta-censorship[/b]
[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/fox-chilling.png[/img]

The movie studio is not the only copyright holder going after their own takedown notices. Other Hollywood studios including NBC Universal and Lionsgate [url="http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/domains/chillingeffects.org/"]have done the same[/url], and Microsoft too.

We expect that the notices are just another byproduct of the automated tools that are used to find infringing URLs. However, it’s a “mistake” that signals one of the key problems of automated censorship, and one that can lead to an endless loop of DMCA notices.

Thus far the infringing takedown notices remain accessible through Google search. Apparently Google has white-listed the Chillingeffects domain because it doesn’t see these indirect links as infringing.

While this may seem logical, Google is no stranger to removing non-direct links to links. If we take a look at the text pasting service Pastebin we see that [url="http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/domains/pastebin.com/"]Google removed 82,937 URLs[/url] from its index. These indirect links are all non-clickable and no different from the DMCA notices.

The standards are shifting in other ways too. No longer is Google merely asked to remove direct links to copyrighted material as the DMCA prescribes, but also links to links to links to copyrighted material.

The above shows the growing mess the current DMCA procedures are creating and for now there is no end in sight. Both Google and the copyright holders agree that [url="http://torrentfreak.com/hollywood-and-google-square-off-over-pirate-search-results-121214/"]something has to change[/url], but understandably the solution they envision is quite different.

In the meantime, copyright holders continue to push the search engine to its takedown limits at a rate of 20 million URLs a month.

To be continued.

Source: [url="http://torrentfreak.com/fox-wants-google-to-take-down-its-own-takedown-request-130404/"]Movie Studios Want Google to Take Down Their Own Takedown Request[/url]

[url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=SEBWKowMaBc:zH2vBVvAbc4:yIl2AUoC8zA"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?d=yIl2AUoC8zA[/img]</img>[/url] [url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=SEBWKowMaBc:zH2vBVvAbc4:D7DqB2pKExk"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?i=SEBWKowMaBc:zH2vBVvAbc4:D7DqB2pKExk[/img]</img>[/url][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~4/SEBWKowMaBc[/img]

[url=http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/SEBWKowMaBc/]View the full article[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...