Jump to content

Sharing 7 Movies on BitTorrent = $1.5 Million Damages


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/running.jpg[/img]BitTorrent piracy is widespread and some copyright holders in the United States have begun to aggressively enforce their rights via legal action.

In most instances the resulting lawsuits end in a settlement of a few thousand dollars. However, over the past few weeks several judges have awarded monstrous damages claims to a maker of adult movies.

Earlier this month Kywan Fisher from Virginia and Cormelian Brown of Delaware were [url="http://torrentfreak.com/bittorrent-pirate-ordered-to-pay-1-5-million-damages-for-sharing-10-movies-trololo/"]ordered[/url] to pay $1.5 million each for sharing 10 movies, the maximum statutory damages possible under copyright law.

Yesterday there was another default judgment due to another defendant failing to defend himself. However, in this case the infringer, Anwar Ogiste from Maryland, must pay $1.5 million for sharing “just” 7 movies.

The order handed down by Illinois District Court Judge George Lindberg is by far the largest file-sharing related damage award in U.S. history.

As with the other two cases, this is not one of the classic mass-BitTorrent lawsuits. All defendants had paid accounts at the website of Flava Works where they could legally download movies. However, they were explicitly forbidden to share the movies with others, and this is where things went wrong for them.

Ogiste was accused of sharing seven movie “clips” on a popular gay torrent site, and Flava had more than just an IP-address as evidence. The company was able to trace the illicit copies directly back to his paid account through a unique code embedded in the videos.

“In this case, every time the Defendant downloaded a copy of a copyrighted video from Plaintiff’s website, it inserts an encrypted code that is only assigned to Defendant. The encrypted code for Defendant is: ‘oxfglyrf’,” Flava explained to the court.





[b]The screenshot[/b]
[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/code.png[/img]

Since Ogiste failed to respond to the accusations the copyright holder asked for a “[i]very reasonable[/i]” default judgment of no less than $1.5 million, or $214,000 per infringed movie.

“Plaintiff seeks total statutory damages of $1,500,0000 for the infringements of its copyrights. Plaintiff, Flava Works, Inc.’s request for an award of $1,500,000 is very reasonable given that Plaintiff’s copyrighted videos were downloaded — or infringed on – thousands of time by third parties on gay-torrents.net,” Flava informed the court.

According to Flava the amount is fair because the movies in question were downloaded a total of 6,632 times. Although it’s debatable whether statutory damages can be demanded for every infringement, the movie studio believed that they could potentially have asked for nearly a billion dollars.

“$150,000 times 6,632 infringements is well over $1,500,000. Thus, Plaintiff, Flava Works, Inc.’s request for an award of $1,500,000 is very reasonable,” they write.

And Judge George Lindberg agreed.

The verdict will be welcomed by Flava and the many other copyright holders involved in BitTorrent lawsuits in the United States. It’s the ultimate pressure method to convince defendants to settle, and as we [url="http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-trolls-a-copyright-troll-121120/"]witnessed last week[/url] these verdicts are already used as such.

For Anwar Ogiste the ruling most likely means paying off a debt for many years.





[b]The order[/b]


Source: [url="http://torrentfreak.com/sharing-7-movies-on-bittorrent-1-5-million-damages-121201/"]Sharing 7 Movies on BitTorrent = $1.5 Million Damages[/url]

[url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=j4wh2dRyud4:ncoJi3Bap_w:yIl2AUoC8zA"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?d=yIl2AUoC8zA[/img]</img>[/url] [url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=j4wh2dRyud4:ncoJi3Bap_w:D7DqB2pKExk"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?i=j4wh2dRyud4:ncoJi3Bap_w:D7DqB2pKExk[/img]</img>[/url][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~4/j4wh2dRyud4[/img]

[url=http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/j4wh2dRyud4/]View the full article[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...