Jump to content

MPAA / RIAA Ponder Suing Persistent BitTorrent Pirates


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/running.jpg[/img][url="http://torrentfreak.com/us-six-strikes-anti-piracy-scheme-delayed-120518/"]Later this year[/url], the Center for Copyright Information (CCI) will start to track down ‘pirates’ as part of an agreement all major U.S. Internet providers struck with the MPAA and RIAA.

The parties agreed on [url="http://torrentfreak.com/how-scary-is-the-us-six-strikes-anti-piracy-scheme-120605/"]a system[/url] through which copyright infringers are warned that their behavior is unacceptable. After six warnings ISPs may then take a variety of repressive measures, which include slowing down offenders’ connections and temporary disconnections.

While all parties are keen to stress that the system is set up to educate, and that the privacy of Internet subscribers is guarded, there is some worrying language in the agreement that has been overlooked thus far.

As part of [url="http://www.scribd.com/doc/97421253/CCI-MOU"]the deal[/url], ISPs have agreed to share progress reports. These reports include a variety of statistics, including the number of warnings that are sent out, and how many frequent offenders there are. Nothing out of the ordinary thus far, but that changes when we read the following sentence:

“The Content Owner Representatives [MPAA / RIAA] or any other member of the Participating Content Owners Group may use such reports or data as the basis for [b]seeking a Subscriber’s identity[/b] through a subpoena or order or other lawful process. For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties agree that the Content Owner Representatives may share such reports with the other members of the Participating Content Owners Group..”

In other words, the MPAA, RIAA and all of its members may use these progress reports to take their own actions against persistent BitTorrent pirates. This sheds an entirely different light on the educational “six-strikes” scheme.

Repeat infringers are not just at risk of having their connections throttled, they can also find themselves dragged to court by the MPAA or RIAA. So much for safeguarding the privacy of subscribers.

The potential legal action is cited again later in the agreement when it discusses what happens after users receive their sixth warning.

“The Participating ISP will, however, continue to track and report the number of ISP Notices the Participating ISP receives for that Subscriber’s account, so that information is available to a Content Owner Representative if it elects to [b]initiate a copyright infringement action against that Subscriber[/b].”

This “action” the document refers to is legal action. Interestingly, if we look at an early draft of the agreement that was made public through a FOIA request, the term [b]legal action[/b] is used. Presumably, this was changed to prevent any alarm bells from going off.





[b]Legal action[/b]
[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/legal-action.png[/img]

While the above is no certainty that the MPAA and RIAA will sue BitTorrent users, they wouldn’t have put the language above in the agreement if it’s not being considered. This is worrying, much more so than the “six strikes” warning system itself.

Time will tell why the RIAA and MPAA put in this option to sue, and how they are going to capitalize on it.

Source: [url="http://torrentfreak.com/mpaa-riaa-ponder-suing-persistent-bittorrent-pirates-120618/"]MPAA / RIAA Ponder Suing Persistent BitTorrent Pirates[/url]

[url="http://torrentfreak.com/?flattrss_redirect&id=52723&md5=b32635e4f32691c1b792bc6a5c804660"][img]http://torrentfreak.com/wp-content/plugins/flattr/img/flattr-badge-large.png[/img][/url]

[url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=LlIp4mRbaU8:LWtsqgLb52k:yIl2AUoC8zA"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?d=yIl2AUoC8zA[/img]</img>[/url] [url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=LlIp4mRbaU8:LWtsqgLb52k:D7DqB2pKExk"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?i=LlIp4mRbaU8:LWtsqgLb52k:D7DqB2pKExk[/img]</img>[/url][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~4/LlIp4mRbaU8[/img]

[url=http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/LlIp4mRbaU8/]View the full article[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...