Jump to content

ISPs Have to Identify Alleged Pirates, EU Court Rules


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/ephone.jpg[/img]Not long after Sweden’s controversial IPRED legislation became law in 2009, five book publishers handed a request for information to a local court.

The rightsholders, represented by anti-piracy group Antipiratbyrån, wanted to force local ISP ePhone to hand over the personal details of a subscriber who allegedly stored more than 2000 audio books on his server, 27 of which breached the publishers’ copyrights.

In June that year the court ordered ePhone to provide the information but the ISP felt it would be wrong to comply, and instead took their case to the Court of Appeal. The ruling of the lower court was overturned on appeal and the case was sent to the Sweden’s highest court.

In the event even the Supreme Court couldn’t decide and it in turn forwarded the case to the European Court of Justice. A few moments ago the ECJ released its decision, one that is sure to please rightsholders.

The ECJ decided that there are no EU barriers which stop ePhone being ordered to provide the information as requested by Antipiratbyrån and the book publishers. The Court said that Swedish law strikes an appropriate balance between the rights of copyright holders and citizens’ rights to privacy.

Having obtained the decision from the ECJ, the case will now head back to Sweden’s Supreme Court.

“We feel very satisfied with this judgment. It is extremely important that we have received this message,” [url="http://www.dn.se/kultur-noje/inget-eu-hinder-for-ipred-lagen"]said[/url] Kristina Ahlinder, president of the Publishers’ Association.

“The important next step is that the Supreme Court gives us the authority, that the evidence is sufficient and that we have the right to share this information. The illegal publication that has occurred from this IP address is comprehensive,” Ahlinder added

If Sweden’s Supreme Court indeed decides that ePhone must hand over the information, it is not clear if the publishers are even ready to continue with a civil case against the alleged infringer. But of course, other entities such as the music and movie industries have been watching closely too, since it clarifies their position going forward. IFPI, among others, are welcoming the ruling.

Source: [url="http://torrentfreak.com/isps-have-to-identify-alleged-pirates-eu-court-rules-120419/"]ISPs Have to Identify Alleged Pirates, EU Court Rules[/url]

[url="http://torrentfreak.com/?flattrss_redirect&id=49832&md5=13034abf91a5b1090a013f2db88db529"][img]http://torrentfreak.com/wp-content/plugins/flattr/img/flattr-badge-large.png[/img][/url]

[img]http://rss.feedsportal.com/c/34423/f/628121/s/1e887d75/mf.gif[/img][url="http://share.feedsportal.com/viral/sendEmail.cfm?lang=en&title=ISPs+Have+to+Identify+Alleged+Pirates%2C+EU+Court+Rules&link=http%3A%2F%2Ftorrentfreak.com%2Fisps-have-to-identify-alleged-pirates-eu-court-rules-120419%2F"][img]http://res3.feedsportal.com/images/emailthis2.gif[/img][/url][url="http://res.feedsportal.com/viral/bookmark.cfm?title=ISPs+Have+to+Identify+Alleged+Pirates%2C+EU+Court+Rules&link=http%3A%2F%2Ftorrentfreak.com%2Fisps-have-to-identify-alleged-pirates-eu-court-rules-120419%2F"][img]http://res3.feedsportal.com/images/bookmark.gif[/img][/url][url="http://da.feedsportal.com/r/132309338243/u/49/f/628121/c/34423/s/1e887d75/a2.htm"][img]http://da.feedsportal.com/r/132309338243/u/49/f/628121/c/34423/s/1e887d75/a2.img[/img][/url][img]http://pi.feedsportal.com/r/132309338243/u/49/f/628121/c/34423/s/1e887d75/a2t.img[/img][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~4/XqurbFl-4_Q[/img]

[url=http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/XqurbFl-4_Q/story01.htm]View the full article[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...