Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Welcome Guest!

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more. It's also quick and totally free, so what are you waiting for?

BLACK LIVES MATTER! ×
BLACK LIVES MATTER!

Tarantino Asks Court to Dismiss Miramax’s ‘Pulp Fiction’ NFT Lawsuit


Recommended Posts

tarantino nftThe popularity of non-fungible tokens, NFTs for short, has reached new highs over the past year.

This has also drawn the attention of celebrities, some of whom agreed to tie their names and creations to these digital collectibles.

Last fall, Quentin Tarantino joined in as well. The movie director announced that he would auction ‘Pulp Fiction’ NFTs to the public. These NFTs will unlock handwritten scripts and exclusive custom commentary from Tarantino, assets that could prove valuable to collectors.

Miramax Sues over Pulp Fiction NFTs

Not everyone was happy with this plan though. Movie studio Miramax, which owns most of the rights to the film, sees the plan as a contract breach and copyright infringement. In a lawsuit filed at a California federal court last November, the movie company accused the director of attempting to cash in on something he doesn’t own the full rights to.

“Eager to cash in on the non-fungible token (‘NFT’) boom, as widely reported in the media, Quentin Tarantino recently announced plans to auction off seven ‘exclusive scenes’ from the 1994 motion picture Pulp Fiction in the form of NFTs,” the complaint read.

Despite this legal dispute, the first NFT was put up for auction early this year, selling for over a million dollars. After that, the project was put on hold, perhaps in part to await the outcome of the lawsuit.

Tarantino Wants the Lawsuit Dismissed

According to Tarantino, Miramax’s claims are ungrounded. His legal team previously described the claims as “offensively meritless” and this week they submitted a motion for judgment, seeking dismissal of the complaint in its entirety.

“Miramax’s copyright claim fails because it misapprehends fundamental principles of copyright law and ignores the clear language of the agreements and assignments,” Tarantino’s lawyers write.

The movie company suggests that by assigning the film’s copyright to Miramax, the director also gave up the rights to his screenplay. That’s not the case, the lawyers counter.

The Film is a Derivative

Tarantino sees the film as a derivative of the screenplay he personally wrote and still holds the rights to, not the other way around.

“Miramax’s complaint assumes that an assignment of copyrights in a motion picture encompasses an assignment of exclusive rights in the underlying screenplay for that motion picture. That turns copyright law on its head,” the lawyers write.

Even if Miramax could somehow show that, by giving up the film’s copyrights, Tarantino also transferred the exclusive rights for the underlying screenplay, that wouldn’t be sufficient. The agreements both parties have signed make it clear that the director didn’t give up the screenplay rights.

“At every turn, the parties bent over backwards to make clear that Mr. Tarantino was not assigning any rights in the Screenplay to Miramax,” Tarantino’s lawyers note.

Tarantino’s legal team makes it clear that the NFTs will not include any content from the film. They will be based on the screenplay which is still owned and copyrighted by the director.

“The Film is a derivative work created from the Screenplay, not the other way around. Because Mr. Tarantino never assigned any rights in the Screenplay to Miramax, Miramax’s copyright claim fails,” the lawyers reiterate.

‘Infringements’ Removed?

It is worth noting that when the TarantinoNFTs.com first launched, it included several film-inspired elements.

For example, the early artwork featured iconic depictions of Samuel L. Jackson and John Travolta, which have since been replaced with an image of Tarantino himself. The original artwork was labeled as copyright-infringing by Miramax so this change appears to be a direct response to this claim.

In addition, several tweets from the Tarantino NFT team with alleged copyright-infringing material were deleted as well. These tweets are also listed as infringing examples in the legal paperwork.

It is now up to the court to decide whether there are sufficient grounds to dismiss the complaint or not. Before that happens, Miramax is expected to formally respond to Tarantino’s arguments.

A copy of the motion for judgement on the pleadings is available here (pdf) and the proposed order to dismiss the case can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

View the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...