Jump to content

Cox Can’t Describe Rightscorp As “Extortionists� and “Trolls� During Trial


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

[img]http://torrentfreak.com/images/trollsign.jpg[/img]Next week marks the start of a crucial trial that may define how U.S. Internet providers deal with pirating subscribers in the future.

Internet provider Cox Communications is facing a lawsuit from [url="https://torrentfreak.com/cox-communications-sued-for-not-disconnecting-pirates-141128/"] BMG Rights Management and Round Hill Music[/url], who accuse the company of failing to terminate the accounts of subscribers who frequently pirate content.

This week the court ruled on several requests and concerns about the upcoming trial. Several of these motions relate to Rightscorp, the company which sends out infringement notices with settlement demands for the rightsholders.

In previous filings Cox described Rightscorp as a copyright-trolling outfit that uses [url="https://torrentfreak.com/rightscorp-offered-internet-provider-a-cut-of-piracy-settlements-150525/"]extortion and blackmail-like[/url] practices to pressure alleged pirates into settling. This language concerned the music companies, who asked the court to exclude it from trial.

This week Judge O’Grady agreed, ordering that Cox is prohibited from introducing irrelevant information about Rightscorp ([url="http://torrentfreak.com/images/motionorders.pdf"]pdf[/url]).

Among other things, the proposed order specifies that the Internet provider can’t reference Rightscorp’s business practices after 2011, including evidence from phone scripts or call recordings.

Rightscorp’s [url="https://torrentfreak.com/rightscorp-burns-4-for-every-dollar-pirates-pay-in-fines-151117/"]precarious financial position[/url] is also off-limits, as well as any allegations that the company violates debt collection or private investigation laws.

Finally, the aforementioned extortion and troll references are banned during trial as well.

“Defendants are prohibited from using derogatory terms such as ‘troll,’ ‘blackmailer,’ and ‘extortionist’ in reference to Rightscorp or Plaintiffs and are prohibited from using terms like ‘extortion’ or ‘blackmail’ to describe the companies’ communications or business practices,’ the order reads.

In addition to this order, Cox faced another setback.

The ISP previously asked the court to prevent the copyright holders from using any material claiming that BitTorrent equals piracy. According to Cox, BitTorrent has [url="https://torrentfreak.com/bittorrent-usage-doesnt-equal-piracy-cox-tells-court-151115/"]plenty of legitimate uses[/url], but the motion was denied by Judge O’Grady.

On the upside, the court agreed with Cox that Rightscorp [url="https://torrentfreak.com/destroyed-piracy-tracking-code-should-end-lawsuit-cox-says-151110/"]destroyed crucial evidence[/url] by deleting older versions of its piracy tracking code.

While this is not enough to dismiss the entire case, sanctions are appropriate and Cox is allowed to reference the destroyed evidence during its opening statement ([url="http://torrentfreak.com/images/spoilor.pdf"]pdf[/url]).

These new developments, as well as the earlier order declaring that Cox is [url="https://torrentfreak.com/cox-has-no-dmca-safe-harbor-protection-judge-rules-151124/"]not entitled to[/url] DMCA safe-harbor protections, show how much is at stake for both sides. The trial is expected to start in a few days and will be closely followed by other copyright holders and Internet providers.

Source: [url="https://torrentfreak.com"]TorrentFreak[/url], for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, [url="http://torrentfreak.com/top-popular-torrent-sites-2015-150104/"]torrent sites[/url] and [url="http://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-vpn-service-provider-review-2015-150228/"]ANONYMOUS VPN services[/url].

[url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=HWROBU3zGCU:xlRrZYzbsZw:yIl2AUoC8zA"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?d=yIl2AUoC8zA[/img]</img>[/url] [url="http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?a=HWROBU3zGCU:xlRrZYzbsZw:D7DqB2pKExk"][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Torrentfreak?i=HWROBU3zGCU:xlRrZYzbsZw:D7DqB2pKExk[/img]</img>[/url][img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~4/HWROBU3zGCU[/img]

[url=http://feed.torrentfreak.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/HWROBU3zGCU/]View the full article[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...