Jump to content

Watch Tower Sues Journalists For Millions in Copyright Infringement Damages


NelsonG

Recommended Posts

pray.pngThe Jehovah’s Witness religious group is perhaps best known for knocking on doors to recruit new followers to the faith. When it comes to their promotional videos and documents, however, the organization takes a very different approach.

As reported recently, people who post their videos to YouTube, for example, can find themselves on the wrong end of a copyright lawsuit. On Thursday, that’s what happened to journalists Ryan McKnight and Ethan Gregory Dodge, who together founded Truth & Transparency (TTF), a site with a mission to provide “religious accountability through impact journalism”.

According to a lawsuit filed in a New York district court by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, the supervising body and publisher for the Jehovah’s Witness religious group, the pair committed massive copyright infringement for illegally distributing Watch Tower’s “motion picture” works.

The complaint alleges that in mid-2018, Watch Tower discovered that 487 of its “copyrighted literary works” had been posted by the defendants on FaithLeaks.org, a site presented in a Wikileaks-style format. Late December 2018, Watch Tower demanded that the works be taken down, alleging breaches of copyright. The defendants reportedly refused to remove the content, claiming fair use under the Copyright Act.

Then, in May 2019, Watch Tower learned that “74 motion pictures” to which it holds the copyrights had been uploaded to RuTube.ru, a Russia-based YouTube-like platform. Watch Tower sent takedown notices to RuTube which resulted in the videos being removed. Shortly after, however, it’s alleged that McKnight and Dodge re-uploaded the videos to FaithLeaks where they remain available today.

Watch Tower points to a May 2019 article published on TruthandTransparency.org in which the defendants “boasted not only about their past infringements and refusals to comply with Watch Tower’s efforts to enforce its copyrights, but also about these new infringements, leaving no doubt as to Defendants’ willfulness.”

The article in question suggests that the videos, apparently recordings of conventions to which the public was invited, were indeed uploaded by the defendants, to elicit commentary and critique from observers. The article further notes that Watch Tower was approached for comment on the event but failed to respond. Albeit several months later, it has now.

In a complaint that details every video and alleged infringements one by one, there are repeated allegations that the defendants “unlawfully copied, reproduced, publicly displayed, publicly performed and distributed” Watch Tower’s videos, in their entirety and without alteration. Dozens of pages of evidence later, the religious group reaches its conclusion.

“Defendants McKnight and Dodge personally participated in, and supervised and directed, the infringing acts described above. Indeed, they personally conceived of, and directed and approved all key aspects of, TTF’s infringing activities. They were the moving force behind those infringing acts,” it reads.

“The acts of Defendants described above were committed without the permission, license or consent of Watch Tower. Upon information and belief, the acts of Defendants described above were committed with knowledge or in reckless disregard of Watch Tower’s exclusive rights in the Watch Tower videos.

“Plaintiff, accordingly, seeks injunctive relief and statutory damages for willful copyright infringement.”

Given that damages for willful copyright infringement can reach $150,000 per infringed work, McKnight and Dodge are facing a potentially massive damages claim running to millions of dollars. Additionally, Watch Tower is demanding the removal of the videos and an injunction which prevents infringement of its copyrights moving forward.

TorrentFreak approached both McKnight and Dodge for comment on but at this time, the journalists declined.

The complaint, filed in a New York district court, can be found here (pdf)

Image credit: Pixabay

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also help you to find the best anonymous VPN.

Torrentfreak?d=yIl2AUoC8zA Torrentfreak?i=H88x1-WiWmk:b6kYxYsyzuk:D
H88x1-WiWmk

View the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Wait, Burning Man is going online-only? What does that even look like?
      You could have been forgiven for missing the announcement that actual physical Burning Man has been canceled for this year, if not next. Firstly, the nonprofit Burning Man organization, known affectionately to insiders as the Borg, posted it after 5 p.m. PT Friday. That, even in the COVID-19 era, is the traditional time to push out news when you don't want much media attention. 
      But secondly, you may have missed its cancellation because the Borg is being careful not to use the C-word. The announcement was neutrally titled "The Burning Man Multiverse in 2020." Even as it offers refunds to early ticket buyers, considers layoffs and other belt-tightening measures, and can't even commit to a physical event in 2021, the Borg is making lemonade by focusing on an online-only version of Black Rock City this coming August.    Read more...
      More about Burning Man, Tech, Web Culture, and Live EventsView the full article
      • 0 replies
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
    • Post in What Are You Listening To?
      Post in What Are You Listening To?
×
×
  • Create New...