Female Viagra fails to get the nod
#1
Posted 05 December 2004 - 03:55 AM
Members of the committee said that the possible risks of the drug — a patch containing the hormone testosterone developed by Procter & Gamble — outweighed what some saw as only a modest benefit in increasing desire and the frequency of sex.
more...
#2
Posted 05 December 2004 - 03:59 AM
The second I heard it I chuckled because I guess I wasn't expecting it to go through, but after a day or two of talking it over with the wife I'll go to others for opinions.
Do you really believe they had health concerns? Or, in an increaingly conservative enviroment, was there concern about the possible implications of women wanting 'it' a bit more? Could the gov't have quietly given the thumbs down?
#3
Posted 05 December 2004 - 12:06 PM
#4
Posted 05 December 2004 - 12:17 PM
#5
Posted 05 December 2004 - 06:20 PM
This is genuine concern and question marks, especially in the post vioxx world.
-Master Shake
#6
Posted 05 December 2004 - 07:07 PM
In my opinion, the growing cultrure of more pills and medication for "lifestyle" will come back to bite people in the ass. One way, or another.
-Master Shake
#7
Posted 05 December 2004 - 07:27 PM
Ken, on Dec 5 2004, 07:07 PM, said:
In my opinion, the growing cultrure of more pills and medication for "lifestyle" will come back to bite people in the ass. One way, or another.
very well put and I agree :)
I take very few medicines . In an entire year I might take 3 dosesof tylenol and maybe a dose or two of cough medicine. All my friends and family swear I am nuts and that I have a need for suffering. I just don't see how putting "pills" into your body all the time could ever help anyone.
LotD: Go Me!
amblurried: yes, Go You!
LotD: I am
LotD: The Confuzzler!
amblurried: ok, you can never say that again
amblurried: it is too similar to cum guzzler
LotD: is that your title?
LotD: lmao
amblurried: :))
#8
Posted 06 December 2004 - 12:04 AM
Shawn, on Dec 5 2004, 09:59 AM, said:
you all know what i think already.
'Drugs usually enhance or strengthen my perceptions and reactions, for good or ill. They've given me the resilience to withstand repeated shocks to my innocence gland. The brutal reality of politics alone would probably be intolerable without drugs.' - Hunter S Thompson
*~the venereal Presleyterians are real happy to be here~*
#9
Posted 06 December 2004 - 12:42 AM
slum_goddess, on Dec 6 2004, 01:04 AM, said:
YUP!! Better living through modern chemistry!!
The future is so
#10
Posted 06 December 2004 - 10:41 PM
'Drugs usually enhance or strengthen my perceptions and reactions, for good or ill. They've given me the resilience to withstand repeated shocks to my innocence gland. The brutal reality of politics alone would probably be intolerable without drugs.' - Hunter S Thompson
*~the venereal Presleyterians are real happy to be here~*
#11
Posted 06 December 2004 - 11:00 PM
slum_goddess, on Dec 6 2004, 11:41 PM, said:
I've that down 4sure. :bigsmile:
The future is so
#12
Posted 07 December 2004 - 01:57 PM
#13
Posted 07 December 2004 - 10:50 PM
Redneck4sure, on Dec 7 2004, 05:00 AM, said:
what are we talking about again?
'Drugs usually enhance or strengthen my perceptions and reactions, for good or ill. They've given me the resilience to withstand repeated shocks to my innocence gland. The brutal reality of politics alone would probably be intolerable without drugs.' - Hunter S Thompson
*~the venereal Presleyterians are real happy to be here~*
#14
Posted 07 December 2004 - 11:33 PM
slum_goddess, on Dec 7 2004, 11:50 PM, said:
How the Hell would I know?? Just forget it.
The future is so
Share this topic:
Fast Reply
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help
Add Reply


Promote to Article
MultiQuote















